Whether a holiday is a ‘package’ or just a booking of travel arrangements can make a big difference when it comes to the legal position if something goes wrong.
A recent case shows why. It involved a man and his girlfriend, who were seeking a ‘last minute’ holiday. When he saw one advertised on Teletext, he telephoned a travel agent and the couple decided to book, heading off the next day.
When he suffered an injury whilst on the holiday, the man sought compensation from the firm with which he had made the booking. However, the firm claimed that the agent would have read a script to him, making it clear that it was acting as the agent for the holiday provider. Proceedings could not therefore be brought against it.
Firms providing package holidays are liable under English law for injuries arising from negligence in the provision of services or accommodation that are part of the package. However, where a travel agent just organises travel and accommodation which are not a package, liability will rest with the individual firm whose negligence caused the injury.
The court held that because the various components of the holiday were shown as separate items on the invoice, the holiday was not a package holiday and so the man could not take action against the firm that took the booking.
On appeal, the Court of Appeal took a different view. The man was not specifically told that he could book the flights without the accommodation or vice versa. Secondly, the original invoice included ‘service charges’, which were not explained. In the Court’s view, these represented the cost of creating a package out of the cost of the flights and accommodation.
The man was therefore able to bring his action against the travel agent.
Click here for information on what consititutes a package tour.
If you are injured on an overseas holiday, it is much easier, in practice, to bring a case against a UK-based travel agent than, for example, a hotel in a foreign jurisdiction.
|Professionally Drafted Will Thrown Out by Court of Appeal|
|French Tax Changes Mean More Food for Thought|
|Court Upholds Deferment of Payment After Business Fails|
|Mortgage Debt Not Regulated by Consumer Credit Act 1974|
|Undue Influence Claim Fails|
|IHT Changes For 'Non-Doms'|
|Businesswoman's £2.7 Million Divorce Award Upheld|
|Fair Comment Still Comes at a Cost|
|Court Rejects Will Made Under Undue Influence|
|National Trust Membership Rules Out Judge in Planning Dispute|
|Assessing Mental Capacity - Guidance|
|Buying Abroad - Considerations|
|Buying a House and Consumer Protection|
|Child Maintenance Explained|
|Cohabitees and Death - Who Can Claim?|
|Divorce and the Company Director|
|Divorce and the Family Home|
|Estates - What Happens if Values Fall?|
|Fact Sheet - Disclosure to Mortgage Lenders of Incentives for Buyers|
|HMRC Guidance on Tax Residence|
|Heir Hunters - Take Advice!|
|IHT Guidance From the Tax Man|
|Making Your Will - Guidance|
|Mortgage Exit Administration Charges - Consumer Redress|
|Planning Law Basics - New Developments|
|Selling Your Property at Auction|
|Stamp Duty Land Tax: Beginner's Guide|
|Taking Children into Care - The Legal Process|
|Unfair Contract Terms - Your Rights as a Consumer|
|What Happens on Intestacy?|